Date of loss: 19 May 2019
City Claims Number: 19-20-046
George Hills Claim Number: GHC0028222
Dear George Hills Company:
REJECTION OF CLAIM REJECTION
Notice is hearby given that the claim sent to John Doe and/or "JD" that was rejected on November 25, 2019 was officially re-rejected by JD on November 25, 2019. The "JD" acronym is being used to protect JD from further harassment/stalking/menacing etc that was allowed to continue at JDs' residence due to gross negligence: 1) first on the part of Sunnyvale POS/DPS; 2) then later GHC who promised to investigate valid claims by JD over roughly the past decade; but either failed and/or refused to take the necessary affirmative actions needed for cessation of illegal activities that were allowed to continue by Sunnyvale POS/DPS and/or Santa Clara POS/SPCD over time after being given a fair chance to do stop such activities (which is a fraudulent claim).
This is turn helped to expose a grossly negligent pattern and practice of discriminatory law enforcement behavior (bolstered by Bagly v. Sunnyvale) leading to entirely new and incredibly severe emotional WTF/POS/DPS/PTSD!?! reactions on the part of JD. Adding to all of this; Sunnyvale POS/DPS not only refused to quell several active threats outside JDs' residence; but they also then chose instead to focus on a safety cone outside of JDs' residence as opposed to arresting the several active threats that existed outside JDs' residence over the course of several years. (Which is an obvious form of prosecutorial misconduct)
This is turn helped to expose a grossly negligent pattern and practice of discriminatory law enforcement behavior (bolstered by Bagly v. Sunnyvale) leading to entirely new and incredibly severe emotional WTF/POS/DPS/PTSD!?! reactions on the part of JD. Adding to all of this; Sunnyvale POS/DPS not only refused to quell several active threats outside JDs' residence; but they also then chose instead to focus on a safety cone outside of JDs' residence as opposed to arresting the several active threats that existed outside JDs' residence over the course of several years. (Which is an obvious form of prosecutorial misconduct)
GO TO: WE ARE BIRDLAND STRONG! @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/02/we-are-birdland-strong.html
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/02/we-are-birdland-strong.html
SEE ALSO: ILLEGAL EJECTIONS FROM PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE CALIFORNIA (2012/2016/2019) @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/05/illegal-ejections-from-private-business.html + MESSAGE TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ABOUT 'DENIAL OF SERVICE' LAW @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/05/message-to-california-governor-gavin.html + THE DNC IS THE CCP IS THE DNC IS THE CCP ETC @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-dnc-is-ccp-is-dnc-is-ccp-etc.html
In other words; due to grossly negligent behavior on the part of GHC; the statute of limitations for this particular case is now unabsolved; as JDs' case is very much alive at this point in time due to official GHC negligence; regardless of limitations imposed by Government Code section 945.6. If there is any judiciary disagreement with this premise; pattern and practice is the next option.
JD would would also like to request an expedient return of all documents that JD sent to GHC over time while JD was caught in this endless GHC procedural loop 'time warp' of you will; and a thorough explanation as to why the GHC San Jose office was unexpectedly closed; perhaps leaving many other claims similar to JD left unresolved as well. Regardless: to be a nice guy JD is sticking to his sale price of $500,000 for roughly 20 years of on and off police misconduct experienced by JD.
GO TO: GEORGE HILLS SJ OFFICE PERMANENTLY CLOSED? @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/01/george-hills-sj-office-permanently.html + JULY 2014 INVESTIGATION OBSTRUCTED? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/01/july-2014-investigation-obstructed.html + JANUARY 2015 INVESTIGATION OBSTRUCTED? @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/01/january-2015-investigation-obstructed.html
Please be advised that regardless of the inclusion of Section 1038 of the California Code of Civil procedure to the GHC rejection notice; JD will seek to recover all costs that occurred over time due to the egregious and grossly negligent police misconduct JD experienced and exposed over time; helping to open police misconduct records here in the State of California among many other heroic good deeds.
Adding to this; the State of California and/or Xavier Becerra and all others involved in the cover up of police misconduct records created illegal enterprises protecting reputations while slandering and/or defaming others in the process. GHC may seek the advice of an attorney of their choice in this matter even though there is a snowballs' chance in HELL of GHC ever winning this case. If GHC desires to consult and attorney; GHC should probably do so now because JD is about to sue the pants off GHC etc otherwise. > GO TO:: MUCKRAKER TIMES @ https://muckrakertimes1.blogspot.com/
SEE ALSO: HTTPS://MUCKRAKERTIMES1.BLOGSPOT.COM @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/04/httpsmuckrakertimes1blogspotcom.html + STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA POLICE MISCONDUCT RECORDS NOW ELIMINATED BY HCJR @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/01/statute-of-limitations-for-california.html
Sincerely; Lawyer Johnny Dough
Note: A thorough discovery process is now needed to ascertain whether or not any unfair class/race/gender-based compensatory advantages have been awarded by GHC within the last year or so; to find out if (for instance) any lesser incidents reported to GHC were perhaps actually awarded compensatory monetary damages in a more expedient manner perhaps based upon financial and/or racial and/or gender-based advantages...
Cause of loss injury or damage: Police misconduct based upon ignoring exculpatory evidence leading to obstruction of justice and/or judicial malfeasance and/or prosecutorial misconduct and resultant defamation of character and/or financial/reputational destruction etc etc etc...
Cause of loss injury or damage: Police misconduct based upon ignoring exculpatory evidence leading to obstruction of justice and/or judicial malfeasance and/or prosecutorial misconduct and resultant defamation of character and/or financial/reputational destruction etc etc etc...
No comments:
Post a Comment