https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-oasis-nightclub-in-sunnyvale-is.html + SEE ALSO: ILLEGAL EJECTIONS FROM PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE CALIFORNIA (2012/2016/2019) @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/05/illegal-ejections-from-private-business.html
NOTE: Financial collapse of small business is nothing new here in Silicon Valley; it is obviously cyclical...Making this region extremely financially volatile and in a sense almost decidedly financially unpredictable -- SEE ALSO: Understanding the Internet Bubble of the 1990s: During the late 20th century, the Internet created a euphoric attitude toward business and inspired many hopes for the future of online commerce. For this reason, many Internet companies (known as “dot-coms”) were launched, and investors assumed that a company that operated online was going to be worth millions. But, obviously, many dot-coms were not rip-roaring successes, and most that were successful were highly overvalued. As a result, many of these companies crashed, leaving investors with significant losses. In fact, the collapse of these Internet stocks precipitated the 2001 stock market crash even more so than the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Consequently, the market crash cost investors a whopping $5 trillion. > GO TO: History of the Dot-Com Bubble Burst and How to Avoid Another @ https://www.moneycrashers.com/dot-com-bubble-burst/ + Dot Com Bubble @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble + Economic ‘Boom’ of the 1990s is a Bust for the Middle Class @ https://www.epi.org/publication/webfeatures_viewpoints_laborday_99/ + Boom and Bust Cycle, Causes, History, and How to Protect Yourself @ https://www.thebalance.com/boom-and-bust-cycle-causes-and-history-3305803 + The Long Boom: A History of the Future, 1980–2020 @ https://www.wired.com/1997/07/longboom/
Furthermore; the landmark case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) invoked the 14th Amendment, defined corporations as "persons" and ruled that California could not tax corporations differently than individuals...It followed that, as legal "persons," corporations had First Amendment rights as well...But with the latest corporate exodus from Silicon Valley; should this landmark decision be re-examined?
QUESTION: If corporations are in fact persons; then why aren't persons who run small businesses considered to be persons as well; given equal rights as the persons who are their customers? And what about Section 230?
The Justice Department is hosting a workshop to examine the scope of a law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The law protects online platforms from liability for their users’ posts and allows them to moderate users’ content without being treated as publishers. As tech companies have grown in size and power, Congress has also questioned whether Section 230 needs an update. > GO TO: BIG TECH'S FAVORITE LAW IS UNDER FIRE @ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/19/what-is-section-230-and-why-do-some-people-want-to-change-it.html
But if corporation/persons are legally protected from liability for their user's posts; why do these larger corporation/persons bother moderating the content of other relatively smaller customer/persons who essentially ARE these corporations as regular customer/persons? If corporations are persons with free speech rights; then aren't regular old every day persons also considered to be persons equally protected as well by the First and Fourteenth Amendments? Since when does something that is not technically an actual person like a large corporation have more rights than an actual customer/person who uses their services? Who are the idiots in control of this crap?
(And since corporations are considered to be "persons"; then logically cats and/or dogs and/or pets in general which are largely considered to be family members (according to the Sunnyvale DPS Chief of Police and/or half the world) should be considered to be "pet/persons" as well...Whereas free speech rights are only abridged when barking loudly and/or keeping people awake at night ~ and/or when the RPF is screaming obscenities outside someone's window in the middle of the night [for instance] as part of a non-coincidental police-sponsored campaign of stalking; harassment and terror...)
Adding to this; these corporate "persons" are not taxed equally as other persons because some corporations actually pay no taxes whatsoever; which essentially violates the 14th Amendment...And these corporation/persons are also generally not audited by the IRS while the poor are generally targeted for audit...
So if this 1886 case law determined that corporations have equal First Amendment rights; why doesn't this pre-established case law along with Section 230 then in turn provide equal protection for corporation/persons and their customer/persons when it comes to liability and modern online free speech? Especially after the First Amendment was argued for roughly 14 years until it was ratified December 15th 1791 (BTW: today is December 14th 2020 -- and some still have a difficult time overcoming their severe cranial-posterior syndromes when it comes to the free speech of others than themselves...) It all gets back to "I'm Ok ~ You're Ok" and/or the common street expression which simply states: "It's all good"...Since 'good' and 'bad' are relative terms; it should be obvious that what abhors one delights another...So what is 'good' and what is 'bad"? Censorship is bad; one thing we can all agree on...
Conclusion: We can all continue arguing ~ and we're all offensive to someone...Free speech is a sacred right for all; but what about slanderous and defamatory online content like that of Mister Olenak; inspired by judicial malfeasance and/or police misconduct? Who is liable in this instance and how can the difference between free speech and the need to limit defamation be mitigated?
Corporations are essentially macro cosmic persons made up of micro cosmic persons who are employed and/or use their online platforms and/or fund their corporate profits...Therefore; the 14th Amendment should not only provide equal protection for these parties when it comes to free speech; but it should also provide due process rights for potential subsequent speech abridgement thereafter as well for both of these connected parties...
Due process and speedy justice that does not exist without expensive legal action when an individual is blocked from using a particular online platform (for instance)...And equal protection for large and small business when it comes to treatment during the current Covid-19 situation...Something that is obviously not occurring...So why is Facebook being sued for violating antitrust/competition laws; while so many small businesses are being shut down as big business Covid-19 "super spreaders" are allowed to continue? Can anyone else see this contradiction?
(Question: How many products sold at the Church Of Home Depot and/or other BIG BOX stores are made in China; while the CCP generally dislikes organized religion and is pleased with the shutdown of places of worship?)
The bottom line is ever since the rise of the NASDAQ back in the 1990s; democrats have been a bit inordinately excited about computer industry profits as small businesses adversely affected by the rise of this new computer industry got less and less attention and finally shut down by the new computerized mono culture...The entire mall industry comprised of mainly small businesses was drastically affected; for instance...Small businesses were more adversely affected and/or disaffected than big businesses during these mall closures...And construction zones quite often shut down small businesses as well...Question: How many big businesses have been shut down by construction zones here in Santa Clara County? None?
GO TO: COALITION OF ATTORNEYS GENERAL TAKING ANTITRUST ACTION AGAINST FACEBOOK @ https://www.cbs17.com/news/north-carolina-news/ncs-stein-joins-coalition-of-attorneys-general-suing-facebook/ + SEE ALSO: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES AND LIVE MUSIC @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2018/01/anti-competitive-practices-and-live.html
"Speedy Justice" should also logically apply to receiving faster justice in local court rooms -- in other words; not having to wait around until noon to make an initial statement when lawyers cost up to $200 dollars per hour...And it should also logically apply to expedited online free speech abridgement resolutions that allow the accused to quickly appeal arbitrary and often unnecessary censorship decisions often made by AI and/or artificial intelligence; and/or conclude in the inability to remove individuals in question from online participation without due process...
"Although courts now permit state and federal regulation of business, corporations have managed to retain the First Amendment rights they were granted in Santa Clara. U.S. Corporations wield vast economic and political power. They have grown into world powers with more resources than many of the countries in which they operate. Monopoly powers have given way to world cartel powers that can be equally abusive. Evils include labor exploitation, price gouging, disregard for environmental protection, stealing of minerals and oil, and aiding and abetting in political corruption around the world. Of course, all multinational corporations are not evil all of or even most of the time. They also provide a vast amount of good throughout the world in providing improved housing, food, education, health care, and economic opportunity in many impoverished parts of the world..." > GO TO: History of Fraud in America @ http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/history/usafraud.html
SEE ALSO: Everything We’ve Learned About Modern Economic Theory Is Wrong @ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-11/everything-we-ve-learned-about-modern-economic-theory-is-wrong
The landmark case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) 1) invoking the 14th Amendment, 2) defining corporations as "persons" 3) and ruling that California could not tax corporations differently than individuals ~ following with, 4) as legal "persons," corporations had First Amendment rights as well -- was the beginning of corporate rule here in Santa Clara County and/or Silicon Valley...Perhaps at least partially explaining the current trend of favoritism towards big business...Once again; Covid-19 has brought this class-based discrimination to the forefront here in this valley...The link below bears reference to the Bagly v. Sunnyvale lawsuit proving low income white males are the most commonly discriminated individuals in this particular region...Which is good news for minorities; but bad news for whites...
A) There is a proven pattern and practice of discrimination here in Santa Clara County when it comes to "low income" individuals; which is a form of class-based discrimination; -- there is no denying this at this juncture; proven by the recent Covid-19 government reaction; B) There is also a certain level of liberal government-sponsored racial bias against whites originating from often hateful and/or biased liberal narratives aimed at winning elections while working to exacerbate and foment racial intolerance against Saltine-Americans like me; which obviously amounts to race-based discrimination; C) And the oftentimes hysterical #metoo movement sort of randomly shoots it's guns into the sky; striking often innocent men in the process and setting a new trend of gender-based discrimiation against males that started in earnest back in the 1990s with the highly dysfunctional Billary Clinton relationship...
GO TO: A THOROUGH DISCOVERY PROCESS CONDUCTED BY AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN LAWYER PROVED THAT LOW INCOME WHITE MALES ARE INORDINATELY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SF BAY AREA REGION @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/06/a-thorough-discovery-process-conducted.html + GO TO: HIS STORY REPEATS ITSELF @ https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/his-story-repeats-itself.html
NOTE: The 2006 false arrest / kidnapping by Officer Pablo Lopez was a total disaster for SCPD whether they want to admit it or not...At the end of the encounter the subject of money came up and I said "I have $65,000 dollars in the bank right now..." Causing Officer Lopez to suddenly look confused and turn white as a ghost; then let me out of my holding cell a few minutes later...Meaning this was a case of class-based discrimination due to the obvious monetary concerns...But there is a story behind this...I was in a band once that traveled to Visalia for the weekend to record a song...We got to stay in a little house that was as big as an average living room; owned by a wealthy local agricultural family...One of the sons of this family who allowed us to stay came by to visit us and told us a little story...He said that being from a rich family; people often tried to use him for his money; including women...So he always dressed down in blue jeans and T-shirts to offset this perception...And I always remembered that; so when I finally got some money at one point in my life; I dressed down and went bare foot for awhile to drive away gold diggers and other users...Which totally fooled Officer Pablo Lopez; and in conjunction proved that this false arrest was in fact class-based...Which most civil rights violations are: class-based ~ not race-based...Then when I asked for a public hearing roughly a year later; an unsuccessful ambush occurred outside my residence in July 2007 right after the request...Which was eventually traced back potentially to the RPF (no data discovery process has been conducted...yet); who were behind a multi-year siege on my residence ~ whether or not they were responsible for the 2007 ambush attempt...And all of this happened in the years after my brother died in a head on collision Xmas eve 1999...You would think our family would be respected during such a sensitive time; but instead our family was non-coincidentally terrorized for a number of years...
GO TO: REST IN PEACE, BROTHER CARL @
https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/rest-in-peace-brother-carl_24.html
IN CONCLUSION: This latest discovery process has exposed an obvious pattern and practice of class-based discrimination against not only low income white male individuals like me; but also low income individuals in general who own small businesses in this region as well...Opening to the door to an eventual class-action status lawsuit against Santa Clara County etc...Adding to this; most civil rights violations are in fact class-based and not color-based...Meaning people with lesser means are often targeted since these individuals generally cannot afford to fight back in court...
Therefore; since government = our money class-based discrimination laws will always be needed...Class-based discrimination protections also mean relatively rich individuals cannot be milked for their wealth -- and/or incarcerated inordinately when they are not a threat to society and/or while others of relatively low income statuses who are similarly non-threatening are released from custody...It goes both ways...And antitrust laws guaranteeing equal competition between businesses are also being violated when only small businesses are shut down and big box stores remain open...There are about a million ways to look at this situation and none of them are good...
The landmark case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) was an early example of legal action taken to stop class-based discrimination against the wealthy...One generally thinks of class-based discrimination in terms of low income individuals being discriminated against; and when that is more often than not the case when it comes to most civil rights violations ~ the other side is class-based discrimination against wealthy and/or high income individuals who are expected to carry the weight of society and pay for all of it's ills...
I especially know about this after being a relatively low income individual most of my life; then suddenly inheriting money from my deceased brother making at least some who work for government think I was in a high income tax bracket when I was not since all the money I got from my deceased brother was taxed before I got it...And I kept working even when I had the money because I like my job; but I did not make enough to be taxed...And a tax accountant who I used to see walking in the neighborhood said that if I didn't make enough to be taxed I didn't have to file; so I didn't...Other than one IRA I was forced to sell during the RPF siege (due to many years of police-misconduct and/or extreme gross negligence) that Fidelity told me "could be taxed" (could be taxed ~ not will be taxed -- which was misleading)...
Between that and the CTFB insisting I had several non-existent employees I never had; I saw exactly how class-based discrimination works; even when it was based upon a false assumption of wealth...I was like a rich poor guy and that conflict caused massive trouble for me; as those with money are quite often seen as government cash-cows who need to be milked...Then every time my pot stocks were rallying during the post-RPF era which was supposed to be an era of financial recovery for me; on several occasions President Obama did press conferences that effectively killed all of the stock rallies and therefore also my financial recovery; which was not a coincidence...
It was some kind of direct retaliation perhaps for my outspoken nature (perhaps?) and basically a race/class-based discrimination since Obama would not have done the same thing to me if I was black...This all happened after I thought Obama would be like the next MLK...What a fucking joke that Obama dude was and/or is...Mainly for opting to tax low income individuals like me who live in an extremely expensive region where $125,000 is considered to be low income and should not be taxed...As taxing low income janitors (for instance) who live in RVs down the street from their work should not owe a cent in taxes beyond what they are already forced to pay when purchasing taxable products is the most obvious and glaring form of class-based discrimination...
The more I think about it realistically; class-based discrimination basically runs our society...While Jesus was likely a really nice guy; society and/or the universe in general is largely run by Darwinian competition; with survival of the fittest when it comes capitalism and/or life in general...Realistically; we all need money to live...
The homeless situation here in Silicon Valley exposes yet another glaring example of class-based discrimination...As individuals overcharged with excessive rents inevitably end up homeless with no pension plans and eventually needing public assistance from rich taxpayers; then discriminated against repeatedly once again once homeless...
GO TO: HIS STORY REPEATS ITSELF @ https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/his-story-repeats-itself.html + THE STORY OF CARY-ANDREW CRITTENDEN @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-story-of-cary-andrew-crittenden.html + THE DEATH OF FRANK CARPENTINO (PART 2) @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-death-of-frank-carpentino-part-2.html
Also; giving $16,000 DUI tickets to people who ride bicycles due to low income status and/or to be safe and avoid drinking and driving should have their tickets expunged and debt erased due to this financial slavery practice...I know it's profitable but it makes zero sense therefore this unethical practice should cease and desist (A Canadian sheriff's son once told me his dad actually encouraged people to get out and ride their bikes to local bars) And now the Covid-19 situation has only exacerbated and further exposed this low income discrimination trend by increasing the amount of homeless due to class-based discrimination against small businesses...
And lack of net neutrality disallows equal competition for small business working on the same time schedule as wealthy business interests...In this case time is not relative; it is equivalent therefore discriminatory against small businesses...
Adding to this; women are some of the main drivers of class-based discrimination and I feel there are various reasons for this...For one; women tend to date based upon finances and this goes on everywhere; and especially here in Silicon Valley and other high income regions...Sadly; love in western society is largely about money...Which I feel has it's roots in the world's oldest profession (calm down ladies) as much as it is rooted in the age old need for a good life and prosperity...And especially in these increasingly expensive modern times with pressing supply and demand issues with exponentially more and more people versus less and less resources...
Christianity essentially made marriage into a 'clean' modern version of the old as the hills prostitution trend; which still largely in most instances amounts to 'pay to play' married Christian sex whether anyone wants to admit it or not...With less STDs and other problems that come with marital infidelity and/or prostitution and/or loose sexual behavior in general...As STDs mixed with infidelity could kill in ancient times ~ just as infidelity can kill in modern times with Covid-19...Nothing much has changed in this respect...And remember that animals like ducks and lobsters and manatees etc were the first monogamous Christians here on Earth; and humans just copied this trend...
Therefore the increasing need for money by government and/or taxpayers who pay for government ~ as inflation and increasingly scarce resources exponentially increases the cost of living ~ helps to drive this unfortunate class-based discrimination trend for both the rich and poor...Like charging people more money for their high-speed internet for example; which is obviously a class-based discrimination as well...
The other side is this: women historically tend to make less money than men when working; perhaps causing many women to choose men based upon their finances instead of love perhaps to make up for their subsequent losses...Which is a form of class-based discrimination within itself when discriminating against women financially ~ and also conversely a class-based discrimination against low income men who just want a companion; as opposed to a large bill for dating...
This kind of class discrimination runs deep in our society...And basic survival instincts very likely largely drive this trend; as people generally listen to their "lizard brains" and worry about basic survival before anything else in life...Because after all; humans are just mammals and/or animals in the end with a basic need to survive...Leading us directly back to government who relies upon our money to survive ~ as well as us needing government to survive as well at times...
Public servants in government for all intents and purposes are essentially slaves (servants = slaves) just as taxpayers are essentially slaves to their public service as well...We are all slaves to each other in this strange government game...But what percentage of time being forced to work for government yearly amounts to slavery; when most pay out roughly 50% percent of their total income annually? And why should people pay any taxes whatsoever after they have been so openly discriminated against and abused with multiple violations of the sacred law enforcement promise to protect and serve all people -- people like me in other words?
We need government now and again to survive; but the times when I really needed government and/or law enforcement they were rarely there for me (probably due to class/race/gender discrimination in my case) While government generally needs us all constantly to survive...Explaining why government is so involved in class-based discrimination seemingly as a rule; because government IS our money and without our money government cannot function...Therefore; government in turn naturally tends to focus on those who have money for their own survival and also generally tends to treat those with money better since they fund government...This was business as usual until Covid-19 entered the picture...Now taxpayers who fund government need money since the federal government (the Obama administration in particular) acted conspiratorially with the Republic of China in the creation of the Covid-19 virus strain back in 2012...Giving China $3.7 million dollars of US taxpayer money to this evil regime...
An evil regime who would have me and many others disappeared and/or killed for merely questioning their bullshit; an evil regime the US government should not have conspired with in such a way...
And almost all disaffected businesses (BTW except for Governor Newsom's winery which remains open) are being discriminated against on a large scale with obvious class-based discrimination...THERE IS NO DENYING THIS AT THIS POINT IN TIME; YOUR HONOR...As big business BIG BOX stores are allowed to remain open as super-spreaders of Covid-19 (Amazon in particular) ~ as small businesses are shut down even though there is way less threat of contagion transfer...As churches are shut down; government continues to worship at the alter of The Church of Home Depot etc...
The bottom line: Government protects future big business when they protect small business -- as all big business was small at one point...As the old adage about not "putting all your eggs in one basket" still rings true to this day...And most small businesses ultimately fail since it is so difficult to bring customers in with so many successful often similar businesses to compete with...Therefore; all the latest Covid-19 reaction does is stack the deck against them more than it already was to begin with...
(BTW: Guitar Showcase owner Gary Wineroth has owned several businesses over time; including a lawn mowing business at the very beginning...Gary once told me that he started several businesses just to get one that was actually profitable in Guitar Showcase...Yet after so many years of great success the City of Campbell has been pressuring Gary lately to give up part of his parcel to make way or new corporate housing...Which can be seen as yet another form of class-based discrimination)...
Adding to all of this; lawyers tend to help out mainly those who have money first; and all others second or last or never...Unless they do pro bono work which is difficult to attain...And this can be seen as yet another form of class-based discrimination and/or a pay to play situation...And many of those dirty lawyers not only end up working in government at some point in time ~ BUT THEY OFTEN END UP BECOMING JUDGES!?!
GO TO: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (FULVIO CAJINA ETC) @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/09/attorney-misconduct-fulvio-cajina-etc.html + UNALIENABLE RIGHTS @ https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/unalienable-rights.html + SEE ALSO: Ugly Judge @ http://uglyjudge.com/ + Exposing the failure of the authority figure @ https://uglyjudge.com/exposing-the-failure-of-the-authority-figure/ + American epidemic corruption @ https://uglyjudge.com/american-epidemic-corruption/ + Richard Fine interview with Director Joe Sorge Exposes Los Angeles Superior Court Judges are accepting bribes @ https://uglyjudge.com/richard-fine-interview-director-joe-sorge-exposes-los-angeles-superior-court-judges-accepting-bribes/ + What happens to good cops who do the right thing? @ https://uglyjudge.com/what-happens-to-good-cops-who-do-the-right-thing/
Note: A few years back right right after I posted the UNALIENABLE RIGHTS blog post seen above; some courageous local women obviously inspired by this blog post decided to take the class-based discrimination case to court...And the lady judge in charge told these women they had to find good examples of this supposed class-based discrimination to prove their claims...But like I said before; females in general are some of the biggest drivers of class-based discrimination; so what else was that biased female judge going to say anyway? In retrospect; I think I just successfully proved that class-based discrimination does IN FACT exist in an overarching fashion and/or on a large scale in this region as well as many other regions as well; whether the lady judge involved in that particular case wants to admit it or not...
UPDATE / 5 FEB 2021: It occurred to me back during the Obama era I was delivering Kush Magazine to about 100 pot clubs in San Jose which got whittled down to about 10 clubs after a massive purge...And while some pot clubs were obviously not playing by the rules; shutting down the entire industry and chasing Kush Magazine out of the bay area region remaining only in LA was yet another example of how small businesses are treated here in Silicon Valley...When if the US government just got out of the way of the burgeoning legal pot industry; we would quickly have business entities as big or bigger than Google and Apple and Facebook etc...
No comments:
Post a Comment