"I always wonder about the beginning of the universe and/or multiverse and how that occurred...Relying on the unthinkable theoretical concept that at one point before the creation of energy and/or matter and/or 'time' -- nothing existed...
Since a quantum of energy lies within each atom; it occurred to me that if a mass quanta of atoms simultaneously split that could create enough nuclear reaction to create the amount of energy and/or mass it would take to create a universe...
But as action-reaction is a basic underlying physical law suggesting that every reaction must be caused by an equal and opposite external action; something would be required to create this theoretical something from nothing to begin with...
So therein lies the conundrum...But 'something from nothing' is a major tenet of the universe; as small seeds grow into tall trees and love originates from who knows where? As magic runs the universe...
But how could cause and effect exist within nothingness? And which came first? The chicken or the egg? Since the answer is very likely YES; then that provides more clues but still not all the answers...The universe is taking the fifth on the matter which is ultimately manifesting as human ignorance...Ignorance I am currently trying to think my way out of utilizing logic for this highly illogical situation...
Therefore; perhaps a massive distant implosion could in theory cause a massive remote explosion of a mass quanta of atoms -- enough to create a universe? But that gets back to something existing when nothing theoretically existed and why would a distant implosion work to split distant atoms?
So out of desperation I fall back on the old impasse of looking at 'nothing' as being something; something being atoms and the elementary particles that cannot be seen to the naked eye...It gets back to the relatively small human perspective explaining why there is not much difference between quantum physics (micro) and quantum entanglement (macro)...Because very big is actually very small within infinite space; therefore perhaps the exact same laws apply...Quantum field theory for instance which Einstein never fully completed...
And again since infinitesimally small atoms hold massive energetic potentiality and are generally seen as being nonexistent; the fact remains that these atoms and elementary particles do in fact exist ~ but how did they come to be? Where did they come from? Were they always there? And if so how is that even possible? Maybe some questions cannot be answered and that is the general nature of the universe; something from nothing and unanswered questions..."
Since a quantum of energy lies within each atom; it occurred to me that if a mass quanta of atoms simultaneously split that could create enough nuclear reaction to create the amount of energy and/or mass it would take to create a universe...
But as action-reaction is a basic underlying physical law suggesting that every reaction must be caused by an equal and opposite external action; something would be required to create this theoretical something from nothing to begin with...
So therein lies the conundrum...But 'something from nothing' is a major tenet of the universe; as small seeds grow into tall trees and love originates from who knows where? As magic runs the universe...
But how could cause and effect exist within nothingness? And which came first? The chicken or the egg? Since the answer is very likely YES; then that provides more clues but still not all the answers...The universe is taking the fifth on the matter which is ultimately manifesting as human ignorance...Ignorance I am currently trying to think my way out of utilizing logic for this highly illogical situation...
Therefore; perhaps a massive distant implosion could in theory cause a massive remote explosion of a mass quanta of atoms -- enough to create a universe? But that gets back to something existing when nothing theoretically existed and why would a distant implosion work to split distant atoms?
So out of desperation I fall back on the old impasse of looking at 'nothing' as being something; something being atoms and the elementary particles that cannot be seen to the naked eye...It gets back to the relatively small human perspective explaining why there is not much difference between quantum physics (micro) and quantum entanglement (macro)...Because very big is actually very small within infinite space; therefore perhaps the exact same laws apply...Quantum field theory for instance which Einstein never fully completed...
And again since infinitesimally small atoms hold massive energetic potentiality and are generally seen as being nonexistent; the fact remains that these atoms and elementary particles do in fact exist ~ but how did they come to be? Where did they come from? Were they always there? And if so how is that even possible? Maybe some questions cannot be answered and that is the general nature of the universe; something from nothing and unanswered questions..."
No comments:
Post a Comment