Saturday, November 16, 2019

KNOW JUSTICE; KNOW PEACE (PART TWO)

On May 19th, 2019 John contacted Sunnyvale DPS for assistance regarding yet another active threat outside his residence; this time it was Avent’s Empty Band Karaoke KJ Doug Ward – which is the same individual who was responsible for a misdemeanor attack against John in 2012. DPS Officers Smith and Ochoa refused to pull up surveillance footage showing the KJ Doug’s attack of John; obstructing justice in the process. John also had his civil rights violated by being ejected from the Oasis nightclub using the color of law in 2012; causing civil injury worthy of compensation due to John being denied equal rights in a public space 3 TIMES – first in 2012; once again in 2016 – and  finally in again in 2019 with the bar being closed shortly after this May 2019 incident. John then unsuccessfully attempted to get Sunnyvale DPS to respond to KJ Doug’s threatening behavior via Facebook messaging. Doug had made criminal threats and/or attempted to dissuade a witness (John) and/or trespassed on Johns’ property when KJ Doug left the threatening message. DPS obviously had an ulterior DPS motive of protecting their own bad reputation in refusing to respond – when DPS has shown a repeated tendency to mischaracterize important events; failing to bring justice to various situations involving John over time.

John was told he was trespassing at the Oasis Nightclub in 2012 (after 10+ years of Oasis Nightclub patronage without incident) by Sunnyvale DPS Officers Smith and Ochoa; which was obviously an illegal order in a public space. Police are also expected to protect the civil rights of those they are sworn to protect and serve. KJ Doug on the other hand; was actually breaking the law in making criminal threats against John while trespassing on Johns’ property in May 2012.

Adding to this; KJ Doug still works for Avent’s Empty Band Karaoke Company even though owner John Avent was on the phone with John the night of Dougs’ misdemeanor assault. Once again; John Avent heard Doug attack John but did not terminate KJ Doug’s employment. John then called Sunnyvale DPS who agreed to show up the next week and pull up the surveillance footage if John was disallowed to sing once again. John requested Officer Jim Carrell to respond; but Officer Carrell was not available. And since DPS Officers Smith and Ochoa refused to pull up the footage once called upon; Johns’ civil rights were violated in the process. 

KJ Doug Ward still works at a City of Sunnyvale owned golf course on Thursday nights and has not been terminated from his job and/or moved to another location out of Johns' zone. KJ Doug worked as an indirect agent for Sunnyvale POS/DPS by leaving threatening messages outside Johns' residence; creating yet another illegal enterprise to protect reputations. Note: Each defendant has knowingly and/or perhaps unknowingly participated in the operation and management of the Enterprise, and has committed numerous acts to maintain and expand the Enterprise. (read more below)

(For some reason the original link has been deleted from the Addendum Blog:
GO TO: POS/DPS OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA: ILLEGAL EJECTION FROM THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN 2012 -- A PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION -- ORIGINAL POST DELETED!?! @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html

+ INCIDENT ON 18 JUNE 2016 / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA = 
PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION @
https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-18-june-2016-oasis.html

+ ILLEGAL EJECTIONS FROM PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION / 
THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE CALIFORNIA (2012/2016/2019) @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/05/illegal-ejections-from-private-business.html

John then received a letter from George Hills Company in July of 2014 claiming an investigation would commence; but the investigation never happened – leaving John in the dark for the last 5 years. And in the meantime; Johns' own investigation was totally ignored; allowing illegal behaviors targeting John to continue unabated in the years afterwards.

GO TO: INCIDENT ON 8 JUNE 2016 / GANG ACTIVITY; CONSPIRACY; 
NON-COINCIDENTAL CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL HARASSMENT AND/OR STALKING; 
DISTURBING THE PEACE; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; WITNESS INTIMIDATION ETC @  

*Terminating the employment of Officer Jim Carrell was the usual action taken by government to cover up abuses; but those abuses continued unabated after Officer Carrells’ exit...    

1) TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/06/to-make-long-story-short.html

2) VARIOUS FRAUDULENT CLAIMS @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2017/11/various-fraudulent-claims-etc.html

3) KNOW JUSTICE; KNOW PEACE (PART ONE) @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/02/know-justice-know-peace-part-one.html

4) CIVIL ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS (42 U.S.C. § 1983); CONSPIRACIES TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS (42 U.S.C. § 1985); CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF CITIZENS (18 U.S.C. § 241); DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW (18 U.S.C. § 242); THE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS CASES (28 U.S.C. § 1443) etc etc etc @ 

Note: AB 813, Gonzalez. Criminal procedure: post conviction relief.

“Under existing law, although persons not presently restrained of liberty may seek certain types of relief from the disabilities of a conviction, the writ of habeas corpus is generally not available to them. Existing law creates an explicit right for a person no longer unlawfully imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a judgment based on newly obtained evidence of fraud or misconduct by a government official, as specified. This bill would create an explicit right for a person no longer imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a conviction or sentence based on a prejudicial error damaging the moving party’s ability to meaningfully understand, defend against, or knowingly accept the actual or potential adverse immigration consequences of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or based on newly discovered evidence of actual innocence, as specified. The bill would require a court to grant the motion if the moving party establishes a ground for relief, by a preponderance of the evidence. The bill would require a court granting or denying the motion to specify the basis for its conclusion...” > GO TO: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB813
The following can be considered a sufficient reason for motion to vacate a judgment based on newly obtained evidence of fraud or misconduct by a government official, as specified: *On December 3rd, 2011; John's beloved cat Precious was found dead on the street in front of his house. The last time John saw Precious was at about 5:30 am on that very same morning; when John said: "I love you, Precious" then went to sleep. After waking up at about 10:30 am the very same day; Johns' neighbors found Precious dead in the street; and came over to tell John what happened. 

While the death of Precious appeared to be an accident; John suspects that it was made to LOOK like an accident when it very likely was not. If you click on this link: > http://likroper.com/dog1.jpg > you will see a dead dog who was apparently killed the same barbaric way as Precious during the recent Romanian dog slaughter (warning: contains graphic imagery). Do you notice blood around the dogs' body? 

There was absolutely NO blood at the scene of the crime where Precious was found dead; only clear fluid from her head after being smashed in the street. (no photos were taken; but several witnesses saw her body). The evidence was suspicious and suggested foul play was somehow involved.

About one month later after the death of Precious;
John found this email from Jake Paolinetti in his email inbox: 
--- On Sat, 12/10/11, Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> Subject: videos To: "likroper@yahoo.com" <likroper@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, December 10, 2011, 2:18 PM / “Hi this is Jake Paolinetti, I am sorry about all the harassing and headaches I have caused you in the past and wanted to let you know I am done with it all and won't be happening anymore.  I was also wondering if you could take down the videos of me?  I would really appreciate it, because that person in those videos isn't me. Thank you, Jake...”

(The videos in question were illegally deleted from http://www.youtube.com/lrevideography – see ‘revolving door of violent stalking and harassment’ link below)

“Existing law creates an explicit right for a person no longer unlawfully imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a judgment based on newly obtained evidence of fraud or misconduct by a government official, as specified...”


Mrs. Rebholtz not only made fraudulent claims to get her children ‘off the hook’ for roughly 5 years of unrestrained non-coincidental stalking; harassment and menacing etc at the 2011 court hearing for the bogus restraining order which was wrongfully given to John; but Mrs. Rebholtz also obstructed justice in the process as well along with Sunnyvale DPS who had ample prior knowledge to shut down the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familias and/or “RPF” -- and the confession from Jake Paolinetti constitutes newly obtained evidence of fraud or misconduct by a government official (Jake’s father was a Santa Clara Police Officer who knew about the non-coincidental staling and harassment and menacing yet took no action to stop it. John believes Jake Paolinetti and friends are likely not only responsible for the death of Precious (no official action was ever taken to prove and/or disprove this possibility) but also the July 2007 conspiratorial ambush attempt that occurred in the days following John requesting a formal hearing regarding his unlawful non-arrest by Pablo Lopez for feeding ducks ex-Santa Clara Mayor Judy Nadler gave John permission to feed at a Santa Clara City Council meeting. The footage of this meeting was later DESTROYED after John alluded to wanting access to it.

CAUSE? – THE SMOKING GUN? POLICE-SPONSORED GANG STALKING; WITNESS INTIMIDATION; CONSPIRACY; LAYING IN WAIT; MALICIOUS MISCHIEF ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-smoking-gun-police-sponsored-gang.html + EFFECT? – Sunday, July 29, 2007 / LAYING IN WAIT, MALICIOUS VANDALISM AND ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER @ https://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/malicious-vandalism-and-attempted.html + SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT
@ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

(the videos in question were illegally deleted from http://www.youtube.com/lrevideography – see "revolving door of violent stalking and harassment" link below)

SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

Note: One of the big lessons of Hurricane Katrina was that people actually care as much or more about their pets than they do about government. In light of this; you would think government would treat our pets and/or animals in general with greater respect. The truth is; many in government don't care about you; or your pets – they only care about your tax dollars that they flagrantly waste in various ways...

This confession written by Jake Paolinetti has been repeatedly shown to Sunnyvale DPS and/or the Sunnyvale City Council and/or George Hills Company etc with zero action taken to correct their mistakes. A continuous pattern and practice of stonewalling and covering up damning facts that would have easily exonerated John have been totally ignored. The Trump administration is doing what justice departments all over America do on a regular basis. Therefore John does not necessarily need another individual to prove a pattern and practice of corrupt police behavior; because John can prove Sunnyvale DPS repeatedly discriminated against John.

But John does know another person who resides in Sunnyvale who has experienced similar discrimination and civil rights violations by Sunnyvale DPS Officers who lacked proper training. His name is Lee Bagley and Lee recently received $150,000 dollars for his rights violations. Lee Bagley gave permission to John to use his case against the City of Sunnyvale for pattern and practice in order to prove that an obvious pattern and practice of corrupt police misconduct exists there. What ultimately came out of Lee’s case was the fact that low income white males are being inordinately focused upon in the Santa Clara County region.

“ii. Failure to train officers
A municipality may also be held liable under Section 1983 for constitutional violations resulting from its failure to train its employees. City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 379 (1989) ("The inadequacy of police training may serve as the basis for § 1983 liability only where the failure to train in a relevant respect amounts to deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of persons with whom the police come into contact.") Only where a failure to train reflects a "deliberate" or "conscious" choice by the municipality can the failure be properly thought of as an actionable city "policy." Id. Monell will not be satisfied by a mere allegation that a training program represents a policy for which the city is responsible. Id. Rather, the focus must be on whether the program is adequate to the tasks the particular employees must perform, and if it is not, on whether such inadequate training can justifiably be said to represent "city policy." Id. The identified deficiency in the training program must be closely related to the ultimate injury. Id. Thus, a plaintiff must still prove that the "deficiency in training actually caused the police officers' indifference." Id. Permitting "failure to train" cases to go forward on a lesser standard of fault would result in de facto respondeat superior liability on municipalities, which the Supreme Court rejected in Monell. 436 U.S. at 693-694. Furthermore, "That a particular officer may be unsatisfactorily trained will not alone suffice. . . for the officer's shortcoming may have resulted from factors other than a faulty training program." City of Canton, 489 U.S. at 390...”

GO TO: Bagley v. City of Sunnyvale @
https://casetext.com/case/bagley-v-city-of-sunnyvale-1

Note: John was emailing  Lee Bagley and the City of Sunnyvale etc in the weeks before Lee Bagley received his settlement stating how Lee’s case and Johns’ case should be combined to bring more perspective and a greater settlement due to the pattern and practice element. Due to this; Lee was whisked off without warning or a heads up phone call from his lawyer to San Francisco to be deposed in a closed court room and received a $150,000 settlement that same day. Then Lee blocked Johns’ texts right after this and no longer speaks to John; which is EXACTLY what the City of Sunnyvale wanted: to divide and conquer Lee and John.
    
GANG STALKING; CONSPIRACY; HATE CRIMES; CYBER HARASSMENT; WITNESS INTIMIDATION (ETC) @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/12/gang-stalking-conspiracy-hate-crimes.html

“Defendants their co-conspirators have for many years sought to deceive about the health effects of their harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing campaign. Defendants have also repeatedly and consistently denied involvement in the harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing of Plaintiff, while evidentiary material gathered by Plaintiff strongly suggests otherwise. Even though Defendants have long understood not only the illegality involved in such behavior, but also the hazards caused by harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing.

Defendants could have developed new strategies to counter this illegal behavior, but defendants chose and conspired not to do so. Defendants have repeatedly and consistently stated that they are sworn to protecting the public in a fair and equal fashion, while using questionable law enforcement techniques that clearly do not protect the public equally.

In all relevant respects, defendants acted in concert with each other in order to further their fraudulent scheme. Beginning not later than 2007, defendants, their various agents and employees, and their co-conspirators, formed an "enterprise" ("the Enterprise") as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4). That Enterprise has functioned as an organized association-in-fact for almost 10 years to achieve, through illegal means, the shared goals avoiding the consequences of their actions. (Sunnyvale D.P.S.; George Hills, Inc etc – Obstruction of Justice etc etc etc)

Each defendant has knowingly and/or perhaps unknowingly participated in the operation and management of the Enterprise, and has committed numerous acts to maintain and expand the Enterprise. 

In order to avoid discovery of their fraudulent conduct and the possibility that they might be called to account for their conduct, defendants engaged in a widespread scheme to frustrate public scrutiny by making false and deceptive statements and by concealing documents etc that they knew would have exposed their public campaign of deceit. This scheme included making false and deceptive statements to the public etc. Defendants' tortious and unlawful course of conduct has caused plaintiff to suffer dangerous diseases and injuries. As a consequence of defendants' tortious and unlawful conduct, plaintiff has depleted all life insurance monies left to plaintiff by plaintiffs’ deceased brother.  The effect of defendants' fraudulent scheme and wrongful conduct continues to this day; as defendants are continuing their unlawful and tortious conduct; and, unless restrained by this Court, defendants are likely to continue their unlawful activities into the future.


If the July 2014 investigation promised by George Hills Company had actually occurred as promised; not only would closure have been brought to the Oasis Nightclub situation by now; but non-coincidental harassment and stalking and menacing by the RPF would have ceased as well.  

Adding to all of this; John not only had his voting rights violated by Sunnyvale DPS; but he also voted for Proposition 64 before the State of California promised not to adversely affect Proposition 215 patients; which was clearly a fraudulent claim made by the State of California that deserves further attention and eventual legal class action. Between these fraudulent claims and/or the destruction of voter approved Proposition 215; all of this has caused John to decide to never vote again after at one point having grand expectations for the internet like online voting for the bedridden etc – which has since morphed into people playing games online and/or our speech being illegally censored by social media platforms etc ~ and with a wrecking ball making the decisions at Vallco Mall...In other words; the destruction of democracy as we know it.
    
at

No comments:

Post a Comment