Throughout the last two decades various fraudulent claims have been leveled against John. These fraudulent claims range from slanderous and defamatory allegations and/or outright lies -- to lies by omission -- to ridiculous exaggerations etc. And in most cases this can be proven. Citing the recent spate of harassment allegations featured in the media as of late; John felt compelled to set the record straight once and for all.
1) Mr. Struble initially corroborated his guilt to Sunnyvale DPS Officer Discher; but somehow either "one hand was unaware of what the other hand was doing" (in other words; Beninger never spoke to Discher and/or vice versa) and/or Beninger knew that John had a negligence case against Sunnyvale DPS and twisted it in favor of the Struble Familia. In a deposition; Mrs. Struble fabricated a story about John beating up Mr. Struble in the street -- but Mr. Struble never exited his vehicle during this incident
-- he returned to work unscathed then corroborated the
story on the phone. Officer Discher then ordered Mr. Struble to drive around the block to avoid driving by Johns' residence; an order Mr. Struble ultimately ignored (failing to obey a police officer). John called Sunnyvale DPS non-emergency line and told them about this; but no action way taken. Either way; Sunnyvale DPS Chief Williams quit shortly after this; commencing a roughly 17 year campaign of lies and deceit...
Either way; Sunnyvale DPS Chief Williams quit shortly after this; commencing a roughly 17 year campaign of lies and deceit...
 |
| SUNNYVALE POLICE CHIEF WILLIAMS NEVER RESPONDED TO JOHN; MAKING THIS A FRAUDULENT CLAIM AND/OR PROMISE OF SORTS -- AND THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA HAS LEFT THE BIRDLAND TRAFFIC CALMING ISSUE AS YET UNRESOLVED -- BUT JOHN NOW WORKS PART TIME FOR CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSIONER DON SUN -- SO THE FOOT DRAGGING ON THIS AS OF YET UNRESOLVED DECADES OLD TRAFFIC CALMING ISSUE WILL HOPEFULLY FINALLY BE ADDRESSED SOON... |
2) Santa Clara Police Department Officers Gabrielle Seagrave (who was and/or is a federal X-Officer) and Pablo Lopez made various fraudulent claims; with one particular false claim accusing John of running away from them as they observed John feeding ducks (ducks that John has fed almost every day since then). John then installed surveillance cameras to prove what happened if there ever was a next time; but that next time never occurred as the surveillance cameras seem to have scared off Officers Seagrave and Lopez; police officers who never returned after the bogus 2007 City of Santa Clara administrative hearing exposing the attack by Mister Olenak and/or causing their weak case against John to quickly go south and disintegrate into the usual police-sponsored bullshit.
3) "The Kid at Peterson field" who caused the unnecessary SWAT team raid on Johns' residence causing John to be shot at with a pepper pellet by Sunnyvale DPS made a fraudulent claim as well. John did not have a gun nor has he ever other than a BB gun when he was very young; and the only people with guns were Sunnyvale DPS (see: gas lighting) as John had a littler claw that day John had been scrutinized numerous times for having by Sunnyvale DPS. Therefore; Sunnyvale DPS had sufficient prior knowledge John regularly cleaned up litter in the Birdland neighborhood and did not need to respond in such a ridiculously over the top and dangerous way. Adding to this; a Department of Defense employee (who shall remain nameless) said Sunnyvale DPS had prior knowledge of John cleaning up litter in the neighborhood; and that Sunnyvale DPS "had it out" for John due to his wildly successful Birdland neighborhood activism. Adding to this; the police commander on the scene wrote in the police report that he used a bullhorn during the incident; when he did not.
Note: The student in question never made eye contact with John; he stared straight down at the ground the entire time; with body language strongly suggesting to John that this student was perhaps involved in a lie and/or a set up.
And in the meantime; the exact same situation still exists -- as John was being a whistle blower alerting people to the fact that dogs were allegedly being poisoned at the Peterson field -- but the usual media-induced emotional demagoguery and paranoid bullshit got in the way; eventually causing Johns' rights to be egregiously violated -- and especially Johns' voting rights which caused John to miss several years of voting due to the color of law being used to intimidate and/or keep John off a property where John had to vote. Question: Why is it (for instance) when poison meatballs and/or poison bait for dogs is found in San Francisco parks; it is considered to be a criminal act -- while this is not?
Note: I thought dogs were part of the family Sunnyvale DPS...
GO TO: CALIFORNIA GROUND SQUIRRELS @ PETERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL FIELD IN SUNNYVALE @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/11/california-ground-squirrels-peterson.html + GENERAL ELECTION DAY / 8 NOVEMBER 2016 @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/11/election-day-8-november-2016.html
4) "Attachment 20 Description of Events" (see photo below) regarding the June 2011 incident is where Mrs. Rebholtz made various fraudulent claims about John; and this can be proven as the entire sequence of events was video recorded by John. Mrs Rebholtz made malicious outright lies to protect her teenage children from prosecution; teenage children who were involved in a multi-year illegal and/or collusive gang enhanced siege against John at his residence where Johns' aging 90 year old Father resides as well. Mrs Rebholtz lied as John never told Mrs. Rebholtz "what a horrible job she did" raising her spoiled brats. The only person John spoke to was Jake Paolinetti. And why did Mrs. Rebholtz yell "JAKE!" as Jake Paolinetti closed in on John that day? Why? Because Jake Paolinetti was clearly the aggressor in this instance.
Also; why did Mrs. Rebholtz file the neighborhood flyer John distributed to the Santa Clara Police Department when the Rebholtz family lives in Sunnyvale? And was then Santa Clara Police Officer Don Paolinetti somehow involved in this flyer incident as well to help cover up for son Jake Paolinetti and/or the Rebholtz Familia as well? And since Google has deleted important You Tube video evidence that prove these claims of false allegations -- apparently due to violation of You Tube "community standards" (video evidence that is crucial to this case) why the hell didn't these videos violate Sunnyvale DPS community standards?!
The bottom line is: if violent, subhuman crap like "Fear The Walking Dead' can be on TV during prime time television hours; what could be possibly be wrong with any of Johns' videos? This is part of the story of Johns' life that John wants remembered after he is gone -- not deleted.
Not only did Mrs. Rebholtz make false statements; but her entire dialogue went south as Jake Paolinetti later confessed to the years long stalking harassment menacing campaign in December of 2011; roughly six months after the Rebholtz party incident -- and Sunnyvale DPS either refused and/or was too lame to put two and two together and unravel the lies.
SEE ALSO: A conversation between John and neighbor Steve Henson [who is a good friend of Officer Don Paolinetti] discussing some of the events in question can be heard @ http://likroper.com/Voice0006.amr > Note: This recording was submitted to ex-California State Attorney General Kamala Harris. GO TO: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND/OR FELONY STALKING AND/OR UNCIVIL HARASSMENT (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/08/obstruction-of-justice-andor-domestic.html
--- Saturday, 12/10/11, Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> Subject: videos To: "likroper@yahoo.com" <likroper@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, December 10, 2011, 2:18 PM: "Hi this is Jake Paolinetti, I am sorry about all the harassing and headaches I have caused you in the past and wanted to let you know I am done with it all and won't be happening anymore. I was also wondering if you could take down the videos of me? I would really appreciate it, because that person in those videos isn't me. Thank you, Jake..."
When one of the same two officers responded to a similar incident (John is not sure whether it was Holt or Mathers who responded) > JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/05/johns-neighbor-jane.html > The Officer told John that it would be good to get a photo of the thieves who robbed Jane's house in order to "place them at the scene" of the crime. This 15 June 2013 incident was but one of countless non-coincidental instances of harassment/stalking/menacing by Jake Paolinetti and friends occurring over several years time.
John then eventually got the photo seen above of Jake Paolinetti and friends through his surveillance system; placing Jake Paolinetti and friends at the scene of the crime (conspiratorially) and even though John gave this smoking gun evidence to Officers Holt and Mathers -- no arrests and/or interdiction was made regarding this incident and it's connection to many other similar incidents over the last decade. in other words; no attempt was made to unravel the various fraudulent claims and/or outright lies leveled against John by the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familias.
John made several efforts to get Sunnyvale DPS to stop the harassment and stalking and menacing he was experiencing; with no affirmative action taken to stop these illegal; conspiratorial and non-coincidental occurrences.
OFFICER ODLE -- Sunnyvale DPS held a police briefing in March 2011 regarding the egregious multi-year stalking and harassment campaign John was experiencing without taking any affirmative action to stop the violations and abuse at the time. The only action Sunnyvale DPS took was Officer Odle (who is a really nice guy and for the most part a good cop) citing a Rebholtz Familia gang member for having a vehicle that was not street legal. Instead of visiting the Rebholtz residence and warning them to stop this illegal and complicit behavior; Officer Odle instead suggested that John change the wording on a You Tube that suggested what John was experiencing was "police-sponsored". This is not necessarily Officer Odles' fault; as he was likely just following orders.
But after trying so many times to get Sunnyvale DPS to simply do their jobs as required; by default it later became "police-sponsored" stalking and harassment. Adding to this; Jake Paolinetti actually used his Fathers' vehicle to perform some of his illegal acts.
Officer Odle said John's videos @ http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY were the subject of a morning police briefing. President Obama was in town; so local government was perhaps trying to appear like they were actually doing their jobs for once -- as the Obama administration was for the most part very anti-freedom of speech compared to the new Trump administration. In other words; Sunnyvale DPS probably thought they could violate Johns' First Amendment rights due to this Democratic party-sponsored censorship. John spoke to Officer Odle about the events which had transpired over the last few years; and Officer Odle gave a ticket to the vehicle seen in the photo (see link below) instead of focusing on the Rebholtz/paolinetti Familias; where further non-coincidental stalking and/or harassment has originated from since then.
GO TO: YOUTUBE.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION + THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/youtubecom-private-business-of-public.html + SEE ALSO: INCIDENT
ON 8 JUNE 2016 / GANG ACTIVITY; CONSPIRACY; NON-COINCIDENTAL CRIMINAL
AND/OR CIVIL HARASSMENT AND/OR STALKING; DISTURBING THE PEACE;
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; WITNESS INTIMIDATION ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-8-june-2016-gang-activity.html
5) Hayley Rebholtz made fraudulent and/or slanderous and/or defamatory claims as well based upon the unnecessary and/or collusive and/or conspiratorial SWAT team actions of Sunnyvale DPS and/or the Santa Clara Police Department back in June of 2010; using the bogus litter claw SWAT team raid as a false reason to become a "woman in peril" and act like she was afraid of John -- even though John was clearly the only one being harassed and stalked; including by Hayley Rebholtz herself...
GO TO: STALKING BY REBHOLTZS' DAUGHTER @
...as Sunnyvale DPS had an sniper placed in the backyard behind Johns' house in neighbor Janes' yard -- alarming Jane and also causing Hayley Rebholtz to seize upon this particular incident to make baseless allegations against John -- when the only thing to be afraid of was the police and their guns; as police shoot and kill people almost every day for next to nothing and receive vacations afterwards. Adding to this; Mrs. Rebholtz also had the gall to write this slanderous comment on the restraining order: "My 15 year old daughter is afraid he is going to go off, get a gun and shoot us..." Yup...the same 15 year old Daughter seen stalking and harassing John at his residence in the link above.
And in the meantime; John would not even know Hayley Rebholtz if she was standing right in front of him as John has never actually met Hayley in person. But for some reason Hayley knows exactly who John is.
Note: Gangs often use teenage girls to do their dirty work; and this is a perfect example. Gunshots eventually came from what appeared to be the Rebholtz residence (two motorcycles) and Sunnyvale DPS refused to respond to the incident -- with a Sunnyvale DPS phone attendant saying something to effect of: "if bodies aren't dropping; we don't respond..."
6) The slanderous, semi-psychopathic social worker at the VCA pet hospital (and/or SSPSW) on 20 September 2016 made fraudulent claims against John as well. Seeing a cast on Johns' fathers' arm; SSPSWS absolutely insisted John injured his fathers' arm even though John clearly did not. (if anything it was Johns' Sister Kris's fault) Johns' Father told SSPSW over and over that John had nothing to do with his broken arm; but SSPSW would not let up and called Sunnyvale DPS who responded and harassed John as his cat Buster lay dying. When a Sunnyvale DPS police dog recently died; the police chief called the dog "one of the family" on TV and considered it an important event to mourn the death.
If this is so; then why did Officers Fuji and Gantt take TWO MONTHS to respond to the death of Missy Cat and/or why didn't responding Officers on the scene of this particular incident (including Officer Mathers; who refused to unravel the case against the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familias) show equal deference towards Buster cats' life?
The next time Sunnyvale DPS showed up was on the day Buster died; suggesting John was perhaps being monitored during one of his most private moments; possibly invading Johns' right to privacy in the process.
7) Johns' sister Kris Davy made fraudulent and/or false allegations as well about John; dragging Johns' father down to the Sunnyvale Police station one day and spewing slanderous and defamatory unprovable lies based upon hearsay evidence; and lacking any actual real physical evidence like John has gathered (see links below) Other than the usual "woman in peril" emotional demagoguery that dominates the news media; Kris offered nothing of any real substance to Sunnyvale DPS.
It is not Johns' fault that Lockheed Martin exposed Johns' father to loud noise that caused his Father to lose his hearing; and John is also not responsible for the fraudulent claims and/or lies of others. John is not required to answer to these false claims; even though he is doing so to finally set the record straight. The bottom line is Sunnyvale DPS have not only displayed an obvious gender bias towards John; but individuals are also required to tell the truth to law enforcement at all times. In the meantime; Kris had attacked John several times before going to Sunnyvale DPS -- and also maliciously vandalized and stole his property as well.
John started noticing his personal items disappearing around the house; so John wrote some harsh potential lyrics for new music as bait for Kris; and left it on the kitchen table. John also took a photo of the lyrics that were written on legal paper as evidence. Kris then not only took the bait and stole the lyrics; but she also destroyed evidence by deleting the photo John took from his smart phone!?!
Adding to this: Kris is returning to ruin Christmas for John this year as well; as being the bane of Johns' existence is a favorite pastime of hers going way back.
8) The IRS/CFTB has been making fraudulent statements as well by overcharging John; in this instance claiming John has 4 employees when John does not and never had employees; so this was a false statement as well. And after appealing this decision through H&R Block -- the I.R.S. continued to make this false claim. And the California Franchise Tax Board (CTFB) took similar actions by sending John "guesstimate/estimate" notices regarding how much John owed; falsely claiming that John owed about 4 times what he actually owed to the CFTB.
THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THE IRS/CFTB
TO PROVE OR DISPROVE THESE FALSE CLAIMS...
Civil rights statutes apply to all races and/or classes. The financially prohibitive nature of the justice system etc here in the United States has created a "class-based financial discrimination" which in effect disallows participation by those who cannot afford decent legal representation; violating the civil rights of countless low income individuals in the process.
SEE ALSO: CIVIL RIGHTS: AN OVERVIEW @
NOTE: ADDING INSULT TO INJURY WAY BEYOND BOGUS POLICE CLAIMS OF JOHNS' NONEXISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS; THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ALSO HAD THE GALL TO SEND JOHN A BILL FOR THEIR OFFICIAL NEGLIGENCE -- A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WHO DID NOTHING TO HELP JOHN FOR ALMOST A DECADE -- EVEN AFTER JOHN HAD CONTACTED THE F.B.I. SEVERAL TIMES!?!
GO TO: ILLEGAL USE OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY AGAINST UNARMED UNITED STATES CITIZENS? #2 @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/12/illegal-use-of-united-states-military.html + LRE RESEARCH @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/search?q=lre+research
SEE ALSO: UNITED STATES PATENT / CANNABINOIDS AS ANTIOXIDANTS AND NEUROPROTECTANTS + 18 U.S. CODE - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/united-states-patent-cannabinoids-as.html
9) T-Mobile has apparently been making false claims as well by apparently overcharging customers; as John was not allowed to change cell phone providers until he paid a final charge of roughly $141 dollars to unlock his T-Mobile phone. John paid the money to T-Mobile and his phone was unlocked; but John still keeps receiving bills from T-Mobile stating John still owes roughly $141 dollars to T-Mobile when he clearly does not. This has just caused John to experience even more harassment.
Question: How many other people who do not owe anything are paying these fraudulent bills from T-Mobile?
SEE ALSO: WOODHAMS LOUNGE BARTENDER RETALIATION -- John was attacked at Woodhams Lounge then ejected from the club in retaliation for calling the SJPD in October of 2012. After John checked his email a few months later; John found an email purposely infected with a virus sent from the bartender/owner of Woodhams Lounge in San Jose!?! Note: The email was apparently sent 3 days after a claim file was filed at the City of Sunnyvale; and it is not known whether the bartender knew of the claim file at the time the email was sent. Question: Why did responding SJPD Officers agree to pull up the surveillance footage at Woodhams Lounge; While Sunnyvale DPS Officers Smith and Ochoa refused to pull up footage at the Oasis Nightclub in 2013? You can see a printed version of the email in question @
http://likroper.com/WOODHAMS.JPG
Note: Sunnyvale DPS Officers Smith and Ochoa came from a younger generation who
did not enjoy the same freedoms that John did. Smith and Ochoa are
likely part of the same generation which had crib-cams installed in
their nurseries. Therefore; why did Officers Smith and Ochoa have such an aversion to gathering surveillance footage from the Oasis Nightclub back in April of 2012? Do Smith and Ochoa actually think they can ignore evidence to crookedly guide the case along like judges do or something? Officers Smith and Ochoa need to respect their elders and the non-discrimination values Johns' generation grew up with.
Owner of the Oasis Nightclub Jerry Grimes also made false statements claiming John was starting fights at the Oasis when that was clearly not the case. John had been attacked and arbitrarily ejected from the Oasis by Avent's Empty Band karaoke host Doug Ward in 2013. Dougs' boss John Avent actually heard Doug attacking John while John spoke to John Avent on the phone regarding Doug disallowing John to sing after 13 years of loyal patronage at the Oasis Nightclub; and Doug was never punished for this misdemeanor assault violation (and/or never officially punished for Johns' arbitrary ejection by Doug from a private business of public accommodation). Therefore; John had his civil rights violated when he was illegally asked to leave the Oasis without a business code based reason by Officers Smith and Ochoa a week later; and once again in 2016 by Oasis Nightclub owner Jerry Grimes.
The Sunnyvale DPS phone attendant who John spoke to the night of the misdemeanor assault by Doug promised to have officers pull up surveillance footage from the Oasis; something Smith and Ochoa later refused to do. Adding to this; Oasis bartender "Ang" heard John speaking to the Sunnyvale DPS phone attendant and ordered John to leave the Oasis for calling the police; something the phone attendant actually overheard. So not only did Sunnyvale DPS essentially make a fraudulent claim of sorts by promising to help John then failing to make good on that promise -- but Officers Smith and Ochoa also allowed John to be arbitrarily and/or illegally ejected from the Oasis; which is a private business of public accommodation. And bartender "Ang" intimidated a witness and obstructed justice by arbitrarily ejecting John. Then Jerry Grimes finally illegally re-ejected John once again from the Oasis in June of 2016 based upon the outcome of those unkept DPS promises and/or lies spread by Doug Ward in trying to cover up his violations.
Also; if this kind of attack happened to a Police Officer; it would be considered to be a felony; so why are the people who are sworn to protect and serve people being protected more than those they are sworn to protect and serve? That is putting the cart before the horse; so to speak. Officer Smith also asked John "are you always like this?"
THE ANSWER IS YES; JOHN ALWAYS WANTS HIS RIGHTS PROTECTED -- THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE AS WE NEED ONE STANDARD OF TREATMENT FOR ALL PEOPLE AS DETERMINED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION...
QUESTION: Why did Sunnyvale DPS help in this instance; but failed and/or refused to help John with the exact same kind of situation? This suggests gender-based discrimination. GO TO: Sunnyvale: Stalking arrest turns up illegal weapons cache, suspected meth lab @ http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/27/sunnyvale-stalking-arrest-turns-up-illegal-weapons-cache-suspected-meth-lab/
===
911 CONSPIRACY EXPOSED: At some point the United States government will have to finally admit some fault in this matter. There is way too much at stake to do otherwise. In the case of the 9/11 incident and the follow up investigation; there are too many lies to count -- with no official affirmative action taken to correct these various discrepancies as of yet. The American people have been fed a false 9/11 dialogue that needs drastic revision. There is not only way too much exculpatory evidence to continue ignoring; but also way too many rights that stand to be wrongfully violated in the future from this egregious, overarching multifarious conduct. Someone has to finally; forcefully break down this wall of silence and speak the truth -- once and literally FOR ALL. For instance; in a court case dealing with law enforcement -- one single lie can upend an entire case and causing mistrial, false verdict or appeal. > GO TO: 911 CONSPIRACY EXPOSED @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2017/12/911-conspiracy-exposed.html
===
Defendants their co-conspirators have for many years sought to deceive about the health effects of their harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing campaign. Defendants have also repeatedly and consistently denied involvement in the harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing of Plaintiff, while evidentiary material gathered by Plaintiff strongly suggests otherwise. Even though Defendants have long understood not only the illegality involved in such behavior, but also the hazards caused by harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing.
Defendants could have developed new strategies to counter this illegal behavior, but defendants chose and conspired not to do so. Defendants have repeatedly and consistently stated that they are sworn to protecting the public in a fair and equal fashion, while using questionable law enforcement techniques that clearly do not protect the public equally.
In all relevant respects, defendants acted in concert with each other in order to further their fraudulent scheme. Beginning not later than 2007, defendants, their various agents and employees, and their co-conspirators, formed an "enterprise" ("the Enterprise") as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4).
That Enterprise has functioned as an organized association-in-fact for almost 10 years to achieve, through illegal means, the shared goals avoiding the consequences of their actions. (Sunnyvale D.P.S.; George Hills, Company etc – Obstruction of Justice etc etc etc)
Each defendant has knowingly and/or perhaps unknowingly participated in the operation and management of the Enterprise, and has committed numerous acts to maintain and expand the Enterprise.
In order to avoid discovery of their fraudulent conduct and the possibility that they might be called to account for their conduct, defendants engaged in a widespread scheme to frustrate public scrutiny by making false and deceptive statements and by concealing documents etc that they knew would have exposed their public campaign of deceit. This scheme included making false and deceptive statements to the public etc.
Defendants' tortious and unlawful course of conduct has caused plaintiff to suffer dangerous diseases and injuries. As a consequence of defendants' tortious and unlawful conduct, plaintiff has depleted all life insurance monies left to plaintiff by plaintiffs’ deceased brother. The effect of defendants' fraudulent scheme and wrongful conduct continues to this day; as defendants are continuing their unlawful and tortious conduct; and, unless restrained by this Court, defendants are likely to continue their unlawful activities into the future.
<><><>
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully — (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(a) Criminal Violation — (1) In general—Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123(b) of title 49, shall — (A) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both; (B) if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and (C) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both.
(a) It is unlawful to do any of the following, or to aid, abet, solicit, or conspire with any person to do any of the following: (5) Knowingly prepare, make, or subscribe any writing, with the intent to present or use it, or to allow it to be presented, in support of any false or fraudulent claim. (b) It is unlawful to do, or to knowingly assist or conspire with any person to do, any of the following: (3) Conceal, or knowingly fail to disclose the occurrence of, an event that affects any person's initial or continued right or entitlement to any insurance benefit or payment, or the amount of any benefit or payment to which the person is entitled.
California Code, Penal Code - PEN § 550 @
SEE ALSO: CAUSES OF ACTION: INACTION AND/OR NEGLIGENCE AND/OR POLICE MISCONDUCT AND/OR DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER AND/OR SLANDER AND/OR GENDER/RACE/CLASS-BASED DISCRIMINATION AND/OR JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE AND/OR MISFEASANCE AND/OR OVERARCHING MALFEASANT INEPTITUDE AND/OR I.I.E.D. ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/10/causes-of-action-inaction-etc.html
"OVERARCHING CONSPIRATORIAL MULTIFARIOUS MALFEASANCE..."
